does anyone recognize this pattern?
View previous topic | View next topic >
Post new topic Reply to topic
M.A.I.L. Forum Index -> Weaves Discussion
   
Author Message

Joined: October 22, 2010
Posts: 403
Submissions: 291
Location: Muncie, IN

does anyone recognize this pattern?
Reply with quote
Posted on Sun Apr 22, 2012 3:05 pm
Link to Post: Link to Post



does anyone recognize this pattern? if so, can you point me to the site? description: box twist 5 in 1.



Joined: April 21, 2012
Posts: 22
Submissions: 0
Location: Henderson, NV

Reply with quote
Posted on Sun Apr 22, 2012 5:10 pm
Link to Post: Link to Post

It appears very similar to a Full Persian 4-1, but slightly off. Sorry I can't be of more help D:


~Gin

Joined: August 05, 2010
Posts: 241
Submissions: 7
Location: Blacksburg, VA, USA

Reply with quote
Posted on Sun Apr 22, 2012 5:19 pm
Link to Post: Link to Post

Could be Lady of the House or Brian Buron's Chain.


while(!finished)
project.addRing();
// Maille Code V2.0 T6.2 R5.6 Eo.n Fper MFe.s Wsm Caws G0.8-1.6 I2.4-8.0 N22.20 Pn Dcdjs Xg39w1 S07

Joined: October 22, 2010
Posts: 403
Submissions: 291
Location: Muncie, IN

Reply with quote
Posted on Sun Apr 22, 2012 6:53 pm
Link to Post: Link to Post

no, it's none of these.



Joined: December 22, 2007
Posts: 4148
Submissions: 106
Location: Hampton, Virginia USA

Reply with quote
Posted on Sun Apr 22, 2012 7:36 pm
Link to Post: Link to Post

Frogs Eggs / Offset Box?


"I am a leaf on the wind." ~ Wash
Lorraine's Chains
Gallery Submission Guidelines

Joined: October 22, 2010
Posts: 403
Submissions: 291
Location: Muncie, IN

Reply with quote
Posted on Sun Apr 22, 2012 7:58 pm
Link to Post: Link to Post

no, it's not that either. this is completely uniform on all sides, twisting, and is a true 5 in 1.



Joined: November 25, 2010
Posts: 1179
Submissions: 81
Location: Es-whoy-malth B.C.

Reply with quote
Posted on Sun Apr 22, 2012 8:47 pm
Link to Post: Link to Post

Full Persian 5 in 1

Joined: August 14, 2006
Posts: 1884
Submissions: 50
Location: McPherson, Kansas

Reply with quote
Posted on Mon Apr 23, 2012 12:13 am
Link to Post: Link to Post

I'll second djgm. I believe it's Persian, not Box.


Comprehensive Diameter Database: Web Page | Online Spreadsheet | About the database

"When you have bigger wire, you make bigger maille. It's neat like that." -Cynake, January 15, 2009

Joined: October 22, 2010
Posts: 403
Submissions: 291
Location: Muncie, IN

Reply with quote
Posted on Mon Apr 23, 2012 12:43 am
Link to Post: Link to Post

yes, that's it. thanks. i disagree with the full persian name, but that's okay.



Joined: May 07, 2008
Posts: 3612
Submissions: 150
Location: Germany, Herxheim

Reply with quote
Posted on Mon Apr 23, 2012 12:54 am
Link to Post: Link to Post

FP5in1 is one of the possible transitions from Box to FP, so it's Euro AND Persian. Just the 'Full' in the weave name is at least questionable, and maybe 'Persian Box Twist 5in1' would be more appropriate.
And there are other ones, like the example that I just made to show - and some more...


-ZiLi-


Maille Code V2.0 T7.1 R5.6 Ep Fper Mfe.s Ws$ Cpbsw$ G0.3-6.4 I1.0-30.0 N28.25 Pj Dacdejst Xagtw S08 Hi

Human societies are like chain mail.
A single link will be worth nothing.
A chain is of use, but will break at the weakest link.
A weak weave will have the need to replace weak links.
A strong weave will survive even with weak links included.
-'me

Joined: August 14, 2006
Posts: 1884
Submissions: 50
Location: McPherson, Kansas

Reply with quote
Posted on Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:08 pm
Link to Post: Link to Post

For what it's worth, I'm not sure I really agree with the Full Persian designation after further scrutinization. It does, however have strong Persian roots, although the sheet weave it is derived from is also a Persian European hybrid by current standards.

Edit: And upon further rumination, I'm wondering. I still think both this and the sheet it says it derives from need European as a tag. However, I got to thinking that instead of the 3 Persian seams and one European seam I was thinking, it might be 2 of each. Time to find some rings to play with, I guess.


Comprehensive Diameter Database: Web Page | Online Spreadsheet | About the database

"When you have bigger wire, you make bigger maille. It's neat like that." -Cynake, January 15, 2009

Joined: March 3, 2002
Posts: 928
Submissions: 243

Reply with quote
Posted on Wed Apr 25, 2012 7:19 am
Link to Post: Link to Post

Yes it's two of each. Every ring has persian linkages but not all linkages are persian.

Most weaves on MAIL are misclassified but other than the historical weaves the family groups are a largely irrelevant classification system anyway.


http://www.mailletec.com

Y'know, that might just be crazy enough to work!

Joined: March 3, 2002
Posts: 4372
Submissions: 79
Location: tres piedras, new mexico

Reply with quote
Posted on Wed Apr 25, 2012 1:48 pm
Link to Post: Link to Post

lorenzo wrote:

Most weaves on MAIL are misclassified but other than the historical weaves the family groups are a largely irrelevant classification system anyway.


i feel like the tag system goes a long way toward rectifying this.


PSA: remember to stretch.
3.o is fixing everything.

Joined: July 23, 2006
Posts: 2180
Submissions: 95
Location: Standish, Michigan, USA

Reply with quote
Posted on Wed Apr 25, 2012 2:34 pm
Link to Post: Link to Post

ElementalDragon wrote:


Edit: And upon further rumination, I'm wondering. I still think both this and the sheet it says it derives from need European as a tag.


Done. Smile


Insistence is futile.

We are the Quartz, lower your shovels and surrender your rocks. We will add your gemological and mineralogical distinctiveness to our own. You will adapt to service us. Resistance is rutile.

Deviant Art
Handmaden Designs LLC Facebook
Handmade Artists Shop
https://twitter.com/HandmadenDesign
http://pinterest.com/handmadendesign/
http://handmadendesigns.com

Joined: August 14, 2006
Posts: 1884
Submissions: 50
Location: McPherson, Kansas

Reply with quote
Posted on Wed Apr 25, 2012 9:04 pm
Link to Post: Link to Post

sakredchao wrote:
lorenzo wrote:

Most weaves on MAIL are misclassified but other than the historical weaves the family groups are a largely irrelevant classification system anyway.


i feel like the tag system goes a long way toward rectifying this.


It's getting there, and "family" tags can be useful, but I'm not convinced that everything under the sun has to fit into one of the previously defined family groups. But I also don't think a new "family" tag needs to be created for every Tomweave, Dickweave, and Harryweave.


Comprehensive Diameter Database: Web Page | Online Spreadsheet | About the database

"When you have bigger wire, you make bigger maille. It's neat like that." -Cynake, January 15, 2009

Post new topic Reply to topic
Jump to:  
Page 1 of 2. Goto page 1, 2  Next
All times are GMT. The time now is Tue Sep 02, 2014 4:20 am
M.A.I.L. Forum Index -> Weaves Discussion
Display posts from previous: